Hockey


HOME
BASEBALL
OTHER
FEEDBACK
FRIENDS AND FAVORITES

RULES
RANKINGS
HISTORY



TEAMS

Teams with asterisks are not yet posted

Abbotsford Heat
Adirondack Phantoms
Alaska Aces
Albany River Rats
Allen Americans
Amarillo Gorillas
Arizona Sundogs
Bakersfield Condors
Binghamton Senators
Bloomington Prairie Thunder
Bossier/Shreveport Mudbugs
Bridgeport Sound Tigers
Charlotte Checkers
Chicago Wolves
Cincinnati Cyclones
Colorado Eagles
Columbia Inferno
Columbus Cottonmouths
Corpus Christi IceRays
Dayton Gems
Elmira Jackals
Fayetteville Fire Antz
Flint Generals
Florida Everblades
Fort Wayne Komets
Grand Rapids Griffins
Gwinnett Gladiators
Hamilton Bulldogs
Hartford Wolf Pack
Hershey Bears
Houston Aeros
Huntsville Havoc
Idaho Steelheads
Iowa Chops
Johnstown Chiefs
Kalamazoo Wings
Knoxville Ice Bears
Lake Erie Monsters
Laredo Bucks
Las Vegas Wranglers
Louisiana IceGators
Lowell Devils
Manchester Monarchs
Manitoba Moose
Milwaukee Admirals
Mississippi RiverKings
Mississippi Surge
Missouri Mavericks
Muskegon Lumberjacks
New Mexico Scorpions
Norfolk Admirals
Odessa Jackalopes
Oklahoma City Blazers
Ontario Reign
Peoria Rivermen
Pensacola Ice Flyers
Port Huron Icehawks
Portland Pirates
Providence Bruins
Quad City Mallards
Rapid City Rush
Reading Royals
Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees
Rochester Americans
Rockford IceHogs
San Antonio Rampage
South Carolina Stingrays
Springfield Falcons
Stockton Thunder
Syracuse Crunch
Texas Brahmas
Texas Stars
Toledo Walleye
Toronto Marlies
Trenton Devils
Tulsa Oilers
Utah Grizzlies
Victoria Salmon Kings
Wheeling Nailers
Wichita Thunder
Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins
Worcester Sharks
Louisiana IceGators 88

Notice: All logos on this page are included within the parameters of 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states that the reproduction of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism and/or comment is not an infringement of copyright. No challenge to the copyrights of these logos is intended by their inclusion here.
Posted 2009 December 12





If you look to the right, you will see the four logos that were under consideration by the Louisiana IceGators before the season began. These were posted on the web, and you could vote on which one you liked. You can, of course, see which one won at the top of the page. All I can say is that either the vote was rigged or the people of Louisiana pick logos about as well as they pick politicians.

The first logo is the same logo that the ECHL team of the same name used. The third (and eventual winner) is a slight — and I do mean slight — variation on the same. In fact, the orientation of the head is the only change in this entry. The second logo is, as best as I can determine, a snow globe with a collection of logo cliches in it. I hate to admit this, but if they actually made this logo into a snow globe I'd probably buy it, just because it would be the most ridiculous snow globe ever made. It would be even worse than this snow globe of Scarface saying "Say hello to my little friend!".

Then there's the fourth logo. I like the fourth logo. It doesn't exactly look like a sports logo, but that's fine. Sometimes you have to go with something different. And while it may not look like a sports logo, it does look really cool. I'm generally fond of minimalist drawing, and I love the way this logo manages to convey the idea of an alligator with nothing more than eight little squiggles. And while I generally don't like red eyes, it works here since there's clearly no attempt to be accurate with the colors. Here it draws your attention to the eye, and the eye looks menacing and vaguely demonic. The word "Icegators" in the logo actually helps it out by improving the height-to-width ratio. This is a fantastic logo. This should have been their logo.

Instead, we get the minor variation on the old logo. And it doesn't work, largely for the same reasons that the old one didn't. First, tan and green is a hideous color scheme. Second, the net is poorly drawn. The only way you would see a net at that perspective would be if you were below it, in which case the alligator would have to be frozen in the ice. Third, it's hard to imagine what position the torso could be in that would allow the legs to be where they are. Fourth, the effect of the snow on top of the letters looks like something straight out of one of those CDs you can buy with 1,000 fonts for $9.99.

Even the changes aren't much help. It's a slight improvement over the original, but only a slight one. Most logos with a head-on perspective create a sense of immediacy as a result. This one doesn't. I think the problem is that the colors are all so muddled that you have to look carefully at the logo to even notice that the head is looking straight at you. By that time, it's too late to be effective.

Then there are the red eyes that worked so well on the fourth logo. They don't work here. Here, the green alligator and the reddish orange net make it clear that this logo is aiming for color accuracy. With that in mind, the red eyes just look stupid.

My advice? Throw out the logo that won, and go with the fourth logo instead. So what if it didn't get the most votes? Buy a few votes to make it the winner...you can't tell me it would be the first time that had happened in Louisiana. That way, the team will have one of the most distinct and one of the best logos in all of minor league hockey, instead of one of the most derivative and one of the worst.

Final Score: 88 points.
Penalties: Region (egregious), 5 pts; Ice, 9 pts; Compound, 13 pts; Software, 8 pts; Wordplay, 7 pts; Cartoon, 17 pts; Name-Logo, 2 pts; Equip-Logo (egregious), 8 pts; Colorful, 13 pts; Yucky-Logo, 5 pts; Yucky-Name, 4 pts.
Bonuses: Local, -3 pts.


This page Copyright ©2009 Scott D. Rhodes. All rights reserved