Hockey


HOME
BASEBALL
OTHER
FEEDBACK
FRIENDS AND FAVORITES

RULES
RANKINGS
HISTORY



TEAMS

Teams with asterisks are not yet posted

Adirondack Thunder
Alaska Aces
Albany Devils
Allen Americans
Atlanta Gladiators
Bakersfield Condors
Binghamton Senators
Brampton Beast
Bridgeport Sound Tigers
Charlotte Checkers
Chicago Wolves
Cincinnati Cyclones
Cleveland Monsters
Colorado Eagles
Columbus Cottonmouths
Elmira Jackals
Evansville Thunderbolts
Fayetteville Fire Antz
Florida Everblades
Fort Wayne Komets
Grand Rapids Griffins
Greenville Swamp Rabbits
Hartford Wolf Pack
Hershey Bears
Huntsville Havoc
Idaho Steelheads
Iowa Wild
Indy Fuel
Kalamazoo Wings
Knoxville Ice Bears
Lehigh Valley Phantoms
Louisiana IceGators
Macon Mayhem
Manchester Monarchs
Manitoba Moose
Milwaukee Admirals
Mississippi RiverKings
Missouri Mavericks
Norfolk Admirals
Ontario Reign
Orlando Solar Bears
Peoria Rivermen
Pensacola Ice Flyers
Providence Bruins
Quad City Mallards
Rapid City Rush
Reading Royals
Roanoke Rail Yard Dawgs
Rochester Americans
Rockford IceHogs
San Antonio Rampage
San Diego Gulls
San Jose Barracuda
South Carolina Stingrays
Springfield Thunderbirds
St. John's IceCaps
Stockton Heat
Syracuse Crunch
Texas Stars
Toledo Walleye
Toronto Marlies
Tucson Roadrunners
Tulsa Oilers
Utah Grizzlies
Utica Comets
Wheeling Nailers
Wichita Thunder
Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins
Brampton Beast 15

Notice: All logos on this page are included within the parameters of 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states that the reproduction of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism and/or comment is not an infringement of copyright. No challenge to the copyrights of these logos is intended by their inclusion here.
Posted 2013 November 12

"Name the team" contests are nothing new, but the hockey team in Brampton seems to have put a twist on the usual approach. From what I can find, they did a realty-showesque "elimination" style name the team contest, with ten finalists that were whittled down one by one until only two remained. I assume the contest was just as fixed as any other name-the-team contest, but it was a neat idea that probably drew more interest than the usual approach would have. Incidentally, the names (listed here in order of elimination) were:

10.Wolverines
9.Vipers
8.Smash
7.Renegades
6.North Stars
5.Blizzard
4.Bengals
3.Arrows
2.Bandits
1.Beast

That's an interesting mix here of names that are overused and names that I've never seen used before, of names that are good and names that are dreadful. But I have to say that I think that the winner was a pretty good choice. I'm not certain it would have been my first pick on the list, but I can't criticize whoever it was that selected the name.

One of the things I like about the name is its vagueness. When you give your team a specific name, be that name Bulls or Cottonmouths or Pirates or Mallards, it creates specific connotations. But a name like Beast is open-ended. Or at least, it can be if you don't get too specific with the logo. Consider, for example, the Lake Erie Monsters. There's nothing there but the very top of the head. The viewer is left to imagine the rest of the creature. Is it bipedal? fish-shaped? snakelike? That's up to you. Does it have a beak? fangs? You tell me. Even better along these lines was the old Madison Monsters of the Colonial Hockey League. All you could see of that monster was five claws (you couldn't even see what the claws were attached to) and two eyes glowing ominously in the background. The Brampton Beast could have chosen a similar approach, but instead they gave us a good view of the Beast. And the Beast, it turns out, is basically just a werewolf. That's a little disappointing. Not because werewolves aren't intimidating creatures (they are), but because of the squandered opportunity. Even if the designer was going to draw something specific, they could have been so much more creative. It could have been something you'd never seen or even imagined before, but instead we get something we've all seen in old "B" movies.

I'm not saying it's a bad logo per se. In fact, I'll go ahead and say that it's a good (but not great) logo. With a name like "Beast", the logo should imply something that you'd be scared of, and I think I'm correct in saying you'd be scared if that thing came after you. But it could have been so much better. They should have kept in mind the rule of horror movies: that which you can't see is always scarier than that which you can.

Final Score: 15 points.
Penalties: Singular, 6 pts; Alliteration, 2 pts; Name-Logo, 2 pts; Equip-Logo, 5 pts.
Bonuses: None.


This page Copyright ©2013 Scott D. Rhodes. All rights reserved