Teams with asterisks are not yet posted

Abbotsford Canucks
Adirondack Thunder
Allen Americans
Atlanta Gladiators
Bakersfield Condors
Belleville Senators
Birmingham Bulls
Bridgeport Islanders
Calgary Wranglers
Charlotte Checkers
Chicago Wolves
Cincinnati Cyclones
Cleveland Monsters
Coachella Valley Firebirds
Colorado Eagles
Evansville Thunderbolts
Fayetteville Marksmen
Florida Everblades
Fort Wayne Komets
Grand Rapids Griffins
Greenville Swamp Rabbits
Hartford Wolf Pack
Henderson Silver Knights
Hershey Bears
Huntsville Havoc
Idaho Steelheads
Indy Fuel
Iowa Heartlanders
Iowa Wild
Jacksonville Icemen
Kalamazoo Wings
Kansas City Mavericks
Knoxville Ice Bears
Lehigh Valley Phantoms
Lions de Trois-Rivières
Macon Mayhem
Maine Mariners
Manitoba Moose
Milwaukee Admirals
Newfoundland Growlers
Norfolk Admirals
Ontario Reign
Orlando Solar Bears
Pensacola Ice Flyers
Peoria Rivermen
Providence Bruins
Quad City Storm
Rapid City Rush
Reading Royals
Roanoke Rail Yard Dawgs
Rochester Americans
Rocket de Laval
Rockford IceHogs
San Diego Gulls
San Jose Barracuda
Savannah Ghost Pirates
South Carolina Stingrays
Springfield Thunderbirds
Syracuse Crunch
Texas Stars
Toledo Walleye
Toronto Marlies
Tucson Roadrunners
Tulsa Oilers
Utah Grizzlies
Utica Comets
Wheeling Nailers
Wichita Thunder
Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins
Worcester Railers
Wichita Thunder 18

Notice: All logos on this page are included within the parameters of 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states that the reproduction of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism and/or comment is not an infringement of copyright. No challenge to the copyrights of these logos is intended by their inclusion here.
Posted 2007 March 24
(Previous review posted 2003 March 27)

I will never understand why anyone thinks "Thunder" is a good team name.

I understand the concept of naming teams after weather phenomena, of course. You want to name your team after something powerful, and many weather phenomena fit the bill. Hurricanes do millions of dollars of damage, sometimes over thousands of square miles. Tornados are more concentrated but more deadly (and can send people to a land of munchkins and witches to boot). Blizzards and Storms are similarly dangerous. Even Fog is treacherous when it gets bad. And Lightning might not cause damage on such a grand scale, but given the fact that lightning is literally hotter than surface of the sun, it's obviously powerful.

But then there's thunder. Thunder, unlike all the others, doesn't actually do anything. The reason for this is that thunder is nothing more than a sound effect accompanying another weather pattern. The worst thunder is ever going to do to you is screw up your hearing. And if you're close enough to the thunder for it to do that, then you have more important things to worry about — for example, the lightning you're standing close to. That's the dangerous part. Calling a team "Thunder" on the grounds that lightning is dangerous is a little bit akin to deciding that since having a sixteen-ton weight fall on you is dangeorus, you should name a team the Squish.

Nonetheless, the name is popular enough that Wichita's team has shared the name with two different teams (first Las Vegas in the now-defunct International Hockey League, and today with Stockton of the ECHL). Teams calling themselves the Thunder often run into the same problem, which is that it's hard to draw a sound effect. As a result a lot of the teams put lightning in the logo, which raises the obvious question of why they didn't name themselves the Lightning in the first place ("Wichita Lightning", in particular, has a nice ring to it). Of course, it's a little tricky making a great logo based on lightning, either. The standard lightning bolt in this logo's "N" is (when divorced from the "N") iconic, but it's a little bit plain. You need to do something to spruce it up. But it's also kind of hard to spruce up. The logo I'm reviewing right now is a case in point. The hurricane effect in the background doesn't really add to it. In fact, combine the hurricane with the point of the lightning bolt and the whole thing sort of looks like a thumbtack. I wouldn't want to sit on a thumbtack, but that doesn't mean I consider them to be highly fierce objects that make great sports logos. (Besides, "Wichita Thumbtacks" does not have a nice ring to it.)

I like the color scheme, but still question whether it was a good idea. Blue and purple, to my knowledge, has never been used before in any North American sport, and the two do work together in an odd sort of way. But they're both fairly cool colors (especially when the purple is such a bluish shade), so the logo isn't nearly as dynamic as it would be if they used warm colors like, say, red and orange.

And, of course, they had to throw the puck into the mix. Guess what? It doesn't help. It doesn't really detract the way that the hockey equipment detracts from some logos, but it doesn't add squat. It's your standard gratuitous hockey reference. Yawn.

In fact, that pretty much sums up my opinion of this whole thing: The puck, the logo, the name "Thunder"'s all just so...yawny.

Final Score: 18 points.
Penalties: Singular, 6 pts; Name-Logo (quadruply-egregious), 7 pts; Equip-Logo, 5 pts.
Bonuses: None.

This page Copyright ©2007 Scott D. Rhodes. All rights reserved