Baseball
HOME HOCKEY OTHER RULES RANKINGS HISTORY TEAMS Teams with asterisks are not yet posted Aberdeen IronBirds* Acereros del Norte Águila de Veracruz Aigles de Trois-Rivières Akron RubberDucks Albuquerque Isotopes Algodoneros de Unión Laguna Altoona Curve Amarillo Sod Poodles Arkansas Travelers Asheville Tourists Augusta GreenJackets Beloit Sky Carp* Billings Mustangs Biloxi Shuckers Binghamton Rumble Ponies Birmingham Barons Boise Hawks Bowie Baysox Bowling Green Hot Rods Bradenton Marauders Bravos de León Brooklyn Cyclones Buffalo Bisons Capitales de Quebec Carolina Mudcats Cedar Rapids Kernels Charleston Dirty Birds Charleston RiverDogs Charlotte Knights* Chattanooga Lookouts Chicago Dogs Clearwater Threshers Cleburne Railroaders Columbia Fireflies Columbus Clippers Corpus Christi Hooks Dayton Dragons Daytona Tortugas Delmarva Shorebirds Diablos Rojos del México Down East Wood Ducks Dunedin Blue Jays Durham Bulls El Paso Chihuahuas Empire State Greys* Erie SeaWolves Eugene Emeralds Evansville Otters* Everett AquaSox Fargo-Moorhead RedHawks Fayetteville Woodpeckers Florence Y'Alls Fort Myers Mighty Mussels Fort Wayne TinCaps Fredericksburg Nationals Fresno Grizzlies Frisco RoughRiders Gary SouthShore RailCats Gastonia Honey Hunters Gateway Grizzlies Generales de Durango Glacier Range Riders Grand Junction Jackalopes Great Falls Voyagers Great Lakes Loons Greensboro Grasshoppers Greenville Drive Guerreros de Oaxaca Gwinnett Stripers Harrisburg Senators Hartford Yard Goats Hickory Crawdads High Point Rockers Hillsboro Hops Hudson Valley Renegades Idaho Falls Chukars Indianapolis Indians Inland Empire 66ers of San Bernardino Iowa Cubs Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp Jersey Shore BlueClaws* Joliet Slammers Jupiter Hammerheads Kane County Cougars Kannapolis Cannon Ballers Kansas City Monarchs Lake County Captains Lake Country DockHounds Lake Elsinore Storm Lake Erie Crushers Lakeland Flying Tigers Lancaster Barnstormers Lansing Lugnuts Las Vegas Aviators Lehigh Valley IronPigs Leones de Yucatán Lexington Counter Clocks Lincoln Saltdogs* Long Island Ducks Louisville Bats Lynchburg Hillcats Mariachis de Guadalajara Memphis Redbirds Midland RockHounds Milwaukee Milkmen Mississippi Braves Missoula Paddleheads Modesto Nuts Montgomery Biscuits Myrtle Beach Pelicans Nashville Sounds New Hampshire Fisher Cats New Jersey Jackals New York Boulders Norfolk Tides Northern Colorado Owlz Northwest Arkansas Naturals Ogden Raptors Oklahoma City Dodgers Olmecas de Tabasco Omaha Storm Chasers Ottawa Titans Palm Beach Cardinals Pensacola Blue Wahoos Peoria Chiefs Pericos de Puebla Piratas de Campeche Portland Sea Dogs Quad City River Bandits Rancho Cucamonga Quakes Reading Fightin Phils Reno Aces Richmond Flying Squirrels Rieleros de Aguascalientes Rochester Red Wings Rocket City Trash Pandas Rocky Mountain Vibes Rome Braves Round Rock Express Sacramento River Cats Salem Red Sox Salt Lake Bees San Antonio Missions San Jose Giants Saraperos de Saltillo Schaumburg Boomers Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders Sioux City Explorers Sioux Falls Canaries Somerset Patriots South Bend Cubs Southern Maryland Blue Crabs Spokane Indians Spire City Ghost Hounds* Springfield Cardinals St. Lucie Mets St. Paul Saints Staten Island FerryHawks Stockton Ports Sugar Land Skeeters Sultanes de Monterrey Sussex County Miners* Syracuse Mets Tacoma Rainiers Tampa Tarpons Tecolotes de los Dos Laredos Tennessee Smokies Tigres de Quintana Roo Toledo Mud Hens Toros de Tijuana Tri-City Dust Devils Tri-City ValleyCats Vancouver Canadians Visalia Rawhide Washington Wild Things West Michigan Whitecaps Wichita Wind Surge Wilmington Blue Rocks Windy City Thunderbolts Winnipeg Goldeyes* Winston-Salem Dash Wisconsin Timber Rattlers Worcester Red Sox* York Revolution |
Notice: All logos on this page are included within the parameters of 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states that the reproduction of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism and/or comment is not an infringement of copyright. No challenge to the copyrights of these logos is intended by their inclusion here. Posted 2009 July 18 Baseball, having a much longer tradition of professional play than football or basketball, has a lot of teams whose nicknames developed "organically", by which I mean they are true nicknames chosen by fans or reporters and adopted by the team instead of being deliberately chosen by the team for marketing reasons. Organic names tend to be a bit more colorful for that very reason. Nobody in Brooklyn sat around and decided that "Trolley Dodgers" would be a good name for marketing purposes. Nobody in Philadelphia thought that "Phillies" would cause opponents to tremble in fear. The people in Toledo didn't think — well, based on the handful of people from Toledo that I've met, maybe they did think "Mud Hens" would be good marketing, but I can't rule out the possibility that their name was organic, as well. As a general rule, I prefer these more colorful nicknames over the slick, chosen-to-sell-T-shirts names you see in other sports such as Houston Rockets or Colorado Mammoth. So even if I find a name like "Sioux Falls Canaries" is a bit odd, I can appreciate the fact that the name has history behind it and deserves a little slack. But what to make of a name like "Greensboro Grasshoppers"? It clearly looks like one of those organic names. It clearly isn't a name deliberately chosen for its marketability. Or is it? The name has no history whatsoever; it only dates back to 2005. Simply put, any name used for the first time these days is being chosen for its marketability, even if it doesn't look like it. At first blush, it would seem that the owners were complete idiots who thought a name like "Grasshoppers" would be trendy the way that monikers like "RailCats" are. But after thinking about it, I think this is the nickname equivalent of Camden Yards. It's brand new, but deliberately designed to evoke the quirkiness of yesteryear. I have no idea what to think of this. Part of me likes it: I like a certain amount of character, and "Grasshoppers" is certainly a better name than "RailCats". But at the same time, I feel like I'm being blatantly manipulated. I'm sure they're hoping people will think this is a quirky name which has a connection to some team that played in Greensboro back in 1902 or something. It's almost, but not quite, lying to me. Nobody appreciates being lied to. There is undeniably a certain charm in the "Grasshoppers" name, but that charm is weakened by the blatancy of it all. This isn't the first time they've done that, incidentally. Their previous name was the Greensboro Bats. Again, there's an obvious charm to such a name in baseball. And, again, it's so obvious that it undermines itself. If they change their name again, they're really going to need to work on that. And then there's the logo. As you can see, the logo appears to be trying to have it both ways. The word "Grasshoppers" is written in that special script you never see anywhere but baseball teams and junior high schools. But the grasshopper itself is pure trendy cheese. It's a weird mutant grasshopper/baseball player, made all the more ridiculous by the fact that the legs are pencil-thin compared to the arms (arms which, let me point out, even Barry "BALCO" Bonds would be jealous of). Overall, the effect is of a junior high school that got a particularly talented student to design their logo. That's not a compliment, in case you're wondering. And speaking of junior high, this would be a terrible name for any junior-high school team to actually use. Any junior high student is bound to immediately notice the thing that I immediately noticed when I first looked at the logo: that you can cover the first two letters of the name and you're left with "asshoppers". I'm not sure why I first noticed this — something about the script in the logo, perhaps — but ever since I did, I've been unable to look at the name or logo without thinking of that. Now I can't look at the logo without snickering. And neither can you. I can only wonder whether the fans in Greensboro have noticed yet. Maybe I should go to a game (it's only an hour and a half away) and see. If they announce a Seventh-Inning Snicker instead of a Seventh-Inning Stretch, I'll have my answer.
Final Score: 146 points.
This page Copyright ©2009 Scott D. Rhodes. All rights reserved
|