Baseball


HOME
HOCKEY
OTHER

RULES
RANKINGS
HISTORY



TEAMS

Teams with asterisks are not yet posted

Aberdeen IronBirds
Acereros del Norte
Águila de Veracruz*
Aigles de Trois-Rivières
Akron RubberDucks
Albuquerque Isotopes
Algodoneros de Unión Laguna
Altoona Curve
Amarillo Sod Poodles
Arkansas Travelers
Asheville Tourists
Augusta GreenJackets
Beloit Snappers
Billings Mustangs
Biloxi Shuckers
Binghamton Rumble Ponies*
Birmingham Barons
Boise Hawks
Bowie Baysox
Bowling Green Hot Rods
Bradenton Marauders
Bravos de León
Brooklyn Cyclones
Buffalo Bisons
Capitales de Quebec
Carolina Mudcats
Cedar Rapids Kernels
Charleston RiverDogs
Charlotte Knights
Chattanooga Lookouts
Chicago Dogs
Clearwater Threshers
Cleburne Railroaders
Columbia Fireflies*
Columbus Clippers
Corpus Christi Hooks
Dayton Dragons
Daytona Tortugas
Delmarva Shorebirds
Diablos Rojos del México
Down East Wood Ducks*
Dunedin Blue Jays
Durham Bulls
El Paso Chihuahuas
Erie SeaWolves
Eugene Emeralds
Evansville Otters
Everett AquaSox
Fargo-Moorhead RedHawks
Fayetteville Woodpeckers*
Florence Y'Alls
Fort Myers Mighty Mussels
Fort Wayne TinCaps
Frederick Keys
Fredericksburg Nationals*
Fresno Grizzlies
Frisco RoughRiders
Gary SouthShore RailCats
Gastonia Honey Hunters*
Gateway Grizzlies
Generales de Durango*
Grand Junction Rockies
Great Falls Voyagers
Great Lakes Loons
Greensboro Grasshoppers
Greenville Drive
Guerreros de Oaxaca
Gwinnett Stripers
Harrisburg Senators
Hartford Yard Goats*
Hickory Crawdads
High Point Rockers
Hillsboro Hops
Houston Apollos*
Hudson Valley Renegades*
Idaho Falls Chukars
Indianapolis Indians
Inland Empire 66ers of San
   Bernardino

Iowa Cubs
Jackson Generals
Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp*
Joliet Slammers
Jupiter Hammerheads
Kane County Cougars*
Kannapolis Cannon Ballers*
Kansas City Monarchs*
Lake County Captains
Lake Elsinore Storm
Lake Erie Crushers
Lakeland Flying Tigers
Lakewood BlueClaws
Lancaster Barnstormers
Lancaster JetHawks
Lansing Lugnuts
Las Vegas Aviators
Lehigh Valley IronPigs
Leones de Yucatán
Lexington Legends
Lincoln Saltdogs
Long Island Ducks
Louisville Bats
Lynchburg Hillcats
Mariachis de Guadalajara*
Memphis Redbirds
Midland RockHounds
Milwaukee Milkmen
Mississippi Braves
Missoula Paddleheads*
Modesto Nuts
Montgomery Biscuits
Myrtle Beach Pelicans
Napa Silverados
Nashville Sounds*
New Hampshire Fisher Cats
New Jersey Jackals*
New York Boulders
Norfolk Tides
Northern Colorado Owlz*
Northwest Arkansas Naturals
Ogden Raptors*
Oklahoma City Dodgers
Olmecas de Tabasco*
Omaha Storm Chasers
Ottawa Titans*
Palm Beach Cardinals
Pensacola Blue Wahoos
Peoria Chiefs
Pericos de Puebla
Piratas de Campeche
Portland Sea Dogs
Quad City River Bandits
Rancho Cucamonga Quakes
Reading Fightin Phils
Reno Aces
Richmond Flying Squirrels
Rieleros de Aguascalientes
Rochester Red Wings
Rocket City Trash Pandas*
Rocky Mountain Vibes
Rome Braves
Round Rock Express
Sacramento River Cats
Salem Red Sox
Salt Lake Bees
San Antonio Missions
San Jose Giants
Saraperos de Saltillo
Schaumburg Boomers
Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders
Sioux City Explorers
Sioux Falls Canaries
Somerset Patriots
Sonoma Stompers
South Bend Cubs
Southern Illinois Miners
Southern Maryland Blue Crabs
Spokane Indians
Springfield Cardinals
St. Lucie Mets
St. Paul Saints
Stockton Ports
Sugar Land Skeeters
Sultanes de Monterrey
Sussex County Miners*
Syracuse Mets*
Tacoma Rainiers
Tampa Tarpons*
Tecolotes de los Dos Laredos*
Tennessee Smokies*
Tigres de Quintana Roo
Toledo Mud Hens
Toros de Tijuana*
Trenton Thunder
Tri-City Dust Devils
Tri-City ValleyCats
Vallejo Admirals*
Vancouver Canadians
Visalia Rawhide
Washington Wild Things
West Michigan Whitecaps
West Virginia Power
Wichita Wind Surge*
Wilmington Blue Rocks
Windy City Thunderbolts
Winnipeg Goldeyes
Winston-Salem Dash*
Wisconsin Timber Rattlers
Worcester Red Sox*
York Revolution
Wisconsin Timber Rattlers 29

Notice: All logos on this page are included within the parameters of 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states that the reproduction of a copyrighted work for purposes of criticism and/or comment is not an infringement of copyright. No challenge to the copyrights of these logos is intended by their inclusion here.
Posted 2013 June 10

This is one of those rare logos where nothing is wrong and yet it's all wrong.

If I look at any part of the snake, I can't find anything that's really wrong with it. The eyes are fine — they aren't realistic, but they effectively look like a menacing pair of eyes glaring at you. Likewise the fangs: fangs on an actual timber rattler wouldn't be visible when its mouth was closed, but we all know snakes have fangs and they look suitably menacing here. The tongue is fine except for the color (it should be black), but color change is acceptable artistic license, and it's perfectly reasonable that a snake would have its tongue stuck out like this. The markings are a good approximation of an actual timber rattler, and the rattle is — well, it wouldn't be called a timber rattler if it didn't have a rattle. There are no goofy baseball references in the logo. All in all this should be an effective logo.

It isn't.

If I'm brutally honest, then I have to say that the snake looks goofy. It looks like a slack-jawed simpleton with crossed eyes, a pronounced overbite and its tongue hanging out of its mouth. None of these items look that way when you focus on just that one item, but look at the whole face and it's sort of undeniable. I'm not sure quite why. Is it that the artist used artistic license one time too many? Is it something in the snake's rictus that changes it from scary to silly? Is something else in the logo causing this? That last part seems unlikely. There's really nothing else to the logo but the name. The way the word "Rattlers" is written is a little odd, but again, there's nothing wrong with it in isolation. If taking that away would fix the issue (and I'm not convinced it would), then it's still the case that the real issue is simply the combination of multiple things that are fine on their own.

I'm totally at a loss as to how anyone could fix this logo, other than to just throw it out and start over. How do you correct something when it doesn't have any mistakes?

As for the name, it's hard to argue with for the most part. Sure, there's the use of the state name instead of the city name, but I'm resigned to that by now. The "timber rattlers" part is fine. Based on the maps I've seen of the timber rattler's range, there are definitely timber rattlers in Wisconsin. There don't appear to be any in Appleton itself (the team plays in Appleton), but the indicated range is such that it wouldn't surprise me to learn there were some in the area until recently, or that they're spreading into the area. And yes, they could very easily be spreading. Timber rattlers' conservation status is "Least Concern", which is conservationist-speak for "These things are all over the damn place." Most conservationists probably wouldn't even care much one way or the other if timber rattlers' range spreads which, when you think about it, is about the least amount of respect a species can get from science. Even showing an active desire to keep the species' range from spreading would at least indicate some form of respect. But when it comes to the timber rattlers, conservationists quite frankly can't be arsed. Thus, "Least Concern".

In any case, the timber rattler's range is not so far away that I'm going to penalize the team for picking such a foreign creature, and it's so widespread that they wouldn't get the Local bonus either way. So, no harm no foul on the name. And it's undoubtedly a good name, which is why the only penalty to the name is the one for using "Wisconsin". But I keep coming back to that logo. I'm fairly certain this is the only time I've ever hit a team with the penalty for a bad logo without hitting them for any actual logo infractions. But like I said at the outset: nothing is wrong, and yet it's all wrong.

Final Score: 29 points.
Penalties: Region (egregious), 17 pts; Logo, 12 pts.
Bonuses: None.


This page Copyright ©2013 Scott D. Rhodes. All rights reserved